Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The court examined whether the receipts from services rendered by IMG to BCCI for IPL were taxable as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA or as business income under Article 7. It held that IMG's Service PE in India existed, and income attributable to it was rightly taxed as business income. However, the court found that the "make available" requirement for FTS was not met as IMG's expertise was not transferred or made available to BCCI. The court upheld the bifurcation of income, allowing taxation under appropriate articles based on the nature of income. It left open the interpretation of the "effectively connected" clause in Article 13(6). The court also held that services utilized for earning income from a source outside India were exempt u/s 9(1)(vii) when IPL matches were shifted abroad. The Tribunal's findings on FTS and Section 9(1)(vii)(b) were set aside.
The court examined whether the receipts from services rendered by IMG to BCCI for IPL were taxable as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA or as business income under Article 7. It held that IMG's Service PE in India existed, and income attributable to it was rightly taxed as business income. However, the court found that the "make available" requirement for FTS was not met as IMG's expertise was not transferred or made available to BCCI. The court upheld the bifurcation of income, allowing taxation under appropriate articles based on the nature of income. It left open the interpretation of the "effectively connected" clause in Article 13(6). The court also held that services utilized for earning income from a source outside India were exempt u/s 9(1)(vii) when IPL matches were shifted abroad. The Tribunal's findings on FTS and Section 9(1)(vii)(b) were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.