Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Transfer pricing adjustment on equity broking services (non-DVP segment/CH settlement) rejected due to negligible difference of 0.01% after considering cost adjustment for sales and marketing function. Port fee charges paid allowed at cost plus 25% markup as per agreement. No adjustment required for administrative support services provided to AE as margin exceeded arm's length price. Addition for brokerage on program trades disallowed as direct third-party transactions without benefitting AEs. Disallowance u/s 14A restricted to assessee's suo motu disallowance due to inapplicability of Rule 8D and availability of surplus interest-free funds. Transfer pricing adjustment on equity broking services (non-DVP/CH segment) remitted for recomputation considering 0.41% as arm's length price after allowing adjustment for sales and marketing function. Disallowance of interest expenses rejected due to availability of sufficient interest-free funds as per Supreme Court decision.
Transfer pricing adjustment on equity broking services (non-DVP segment/CH settlement) rejected due to negligible difference of 0.01% after considering cost adjustment for sales and marketing function. Port fee charges paid allowed at cost plus 25% markup as per agreement. No adjustment required for administrative support services provided to AE as margin exceeded arm's length price. Addition for brokerage on program trades disallowed as direct third-party transactions without benefitting AEs. Disallowance u/s 14A restricted to assessee's suo motu disallowance due to inapplicability of Rule 8D and availability of surplus interest-free funds. Transfer pricing adjustment on equity broking services (non-DVP/CH segment) remitted for recomputation considering 0.41% as arm's length price after allowing adjustment for sales and marketing function. Disallowance of interest expenses rejected due to availability of sufficient interest-free funds as per Supreme Court decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.