Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The coordinate benches of the Tribunal have consistently decided the issue of availment of CENVAT credit by insurance companies on invoices issued by dealers or manufacturers, holding that such credit is permissible when service tax has undisputedly been paid to the government. The High Court cannot sit in appeal over its earlier final order in the same matter. The doctrine of precedents mandates that a coordinate bench is bound by the final order of another coordinate bench. The dissent by the Member (Technical) of the Tribunal, derogating from the consistent view of coordinate benches, and referring the matter to a Third Member, is impermissible. Consequently, the prejudicial portion of the order by the Member (Technical) is quashed.
The coordinate benches of the Tribunal have consistently decided the issue of availment of CENVAT credit by insurance companies on invoices issued by dealers or manufacturers, holding that such credit is permissible when service tax has undisputedly been paid to the government. The High Court cannot sit in appeal over its earlier final order in the same matter. The doctrine of precedents mandates that a coordinate bench is bound by the final order of another coordinate bench. The dissent by the Member (Technical) of the Tribunal, derogating from the consistent view of coordinate benches, and referring the matter to a Third Member, is impermissible. Consequently, the prejudicial portion of the order by the Member (Technical) is quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.