Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Taxable value determination for reseller agreement - repatriated amount after deducting profit margin and costs incurred in reselling IT-enabled services not correct value u/s 67. Appellants incurred expenses offset and reimbursed by principal supplying services. Price at import could not be determined, linked to price realized from Indian customer. Gross value charged to customer basis for computing principal's price, cannot exclude reimbursable expenses under reverse charge mechanism provisions treating appellants as service providers. Section 67 applicable. Extended period limitation and penalty - revenue neutrality not available as defense, show cause notices within normal period. Appellate orders on including operating/marketing expenses in gross value and de novo proceedings on extended period invocation and penalty imposition correct. Appeal dismissed.
Taxable value determination for reseller agreement - repatriated amount after deducting profit margin and costs incurred in reselling IT-enabled services not correct value u/s 67. Appellants incurred expenses offset and reimbursed by principal supplying services. Price at import could not be determined, linked to price realized from Indian customer. Gross value charged to customer basis for computing principal's price, cannot exclude reimbursable expenses under reverse charge mechanism provisions treating appellants as service providers. Section 67 applicable. Extended period limitation and penalty - revenue neutrality not available as defense, show cause notices within normal period. Appellate orders on including operating/marketing expenses in gross value and de novo proceedings on extended period invocation and penalty imposition correct. Appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.