Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Petition dismissed due to time limitation. Petitioners granted liberty to approach Appellate Commissioner u/s 107 of GST Act, subject to depositing 25% of disputed tax, with 10% being mandatory requirement u/s 107 and additional 15% for approaching court after expiry of limitation period. Petitioners directed to deposit 25% of disputed tax from Electronic Cash Register within 30 days from receipt of order. Petition disposed of.
Petition dismissed due to time limitation. Petitioners granted liberty to approach Appellate Commissioner u/s 107 of GST Act, subject to depositing 25% of disputed tax, with 10% being mandatory requirement u/s 107 and additional 15% for approaching court after expiry of limitation period. Petitioners directed to deposit 25% of disputed tax from Electronic Cash Register within 30 days from receipt of order. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.