Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
Overlapping demand confirmed u/s 63 and Section 74 of TNGST Act for same assessment years cannot be challenged. However, petitioner's failure to reply to show cause notices preceding impugned orders necessitates remand for fresh orders on merits in accordance with law by respondents after detailed consideration. Petitions disposed off through remand.
Overlapping demand confirmed u/s 63 and Section 74 of TNGST Act for same assessment years cannot be challenged. However, petitioner's failure to reply to show cause notices preceding impugned orders necessitates remand for fresh orders on merits in accordance with law by respondents after detailed consideration. Petitions disposed off through remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.