Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The appeal filed by the petitioner u/s 107 of the West Bengal/Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was rejected. The petitioner argued lack of opportunity to respond to Show Cause Notice (SCN) online. The court found the delay in filing the appeal justified due to lack of knowledge of the order and allowed condonation beyond the prescribed period. The appellate authority's decision was deemed flawed and set aside based on precedent allowing for condonation of delay. The matter was not remanded on the issue of delay, and the appellate authority was directed to hear and decide the appeal within eight weeks.
The appeal filed by the petitioner u/s 107 of the West Bengal/Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was rejected. The petitioner argued lack of opportunity to respond to Show Cause Notice (SCN) online. The court found the delay in filing the appeal justified due to lack of knowledge of the order and allowed condonation beyond the prescribed period. The appellate authority's decision was deemed flawed and set aside based on precedent allowing for condonation of delay. The matter was not remanded on the issue of delay, and the appellate authority was directed to hear and decide the appeal within eight weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.