Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
The appeal filed by the petitioner u/s 107 of the West Bengal/Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was rejected. The petitioner argued lack of opportunity to respond to Show Cause Notice (SCN) online. The court found the delay in filing the appeal justified due to lack of knowledge of the order and allowed condonation beyond the prescribed period. The appellate authority's decision was deemed flawed and set aside based on precedent allowing for condonation of delay. The matter was not remanded on the issue of delay, and the appellate authority was directed to hear and decide the appeal within eight weeks.
The appeal filed by the petitioner u/s 107 of the West Bengal/Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was rejected. The petitioner argued lack of opportunity to respond to Show Cause Notice (SCN) online. The court found the delay in filing the appeal justified due to lack of knowledge of the order and allowed condonation beyond the prescribed period. The appellate authority's decision was deemed flawed and set aside based on precedent allowing for condonation of delay. The matter was not remanded on the issue of delay, and the appellate authority was directed to hear and decide the appeal within eight weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.