Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The appeal filed by the petitioner u/s 107 of the West Bengal/Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was rejected. The petitioner argued lack of opportunity to respond to Show Cause Notice (SCN) online. The court found the delay in filing the appeal justified due to lack of knowledge of the order and allowed condonation beyond the prescribed period. The appellate authority's decision was deemed flawed and set aside based on precedent allowing for condonation of delay. The matter was not remanded on the issue of delay, and the appellate authority was directed to hear and decide the appeal within eight weeks.
The appeal filed by the petitioner u/s 107 of the West Bengal/Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was rejected. The petitioner argued lack of opportunity to respond to Show Cause Notice (SCN) online. The court found the delay in filing the appeal justified due to lack of knowledge of the order and allowed condonation beyond the prescribed period. The appellate authority's decision was deemed flawed and set aside based on precedent allowing for condonation of delay. The matter was not remanded on the issue of delay, and the appellate authority was directed to hear and decide the appeal within eight weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.