Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The High Court address the rejection of revision petition u/s 264 due to an inadvertent error in filing Form ITR-VII, resulting in denial of exemption to a trust approved u/s 10(23C) of the Income-tax Act. The court found that the Trust was entitled to exemption as there was no indication otherwise. The respondent's rejection based on filing errors without considering the exemption claim requires reconsideration. The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the respondent to issue a fresh order within three months considering the court's observations.
The High Court address the rejection of revision petition u/s 264 due to an inadvertent error in filing Form ITR-VII, resulting in denial of exemption to a trust approved u/s 10(23C) of the Income-tax Act. The court found that the Trust was entitled to exemption as there was no indication otherwise. The respondent's rejection based on filing errors without considering the exemption claim requires reconsideration. The court set aside the order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, directing the respondent to issue a fresh order within three months considering the court's observations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.