Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the transfer of the right to acquire property should be categorized as a long-term or short-term capital gain. The Tribunal found that the right accrued to the assessee upon issuance of the allotment letter, granting the right to purchase the flat. The holding period was determined to commence from the date of the allotment letter, resulting in the gain being classified as long-term. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the deduction claim u/s 54F, emphasizing the authority of appellate bodies to entertain such claims. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for verification in accordance with the law.
The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the transfer of the right to acquire property should be categorized as a long-term or short-term capital gain. The Tribunal found that the right accrued to the assessee upon issuance of the allotment letter, granting the right to purchase the flat. The holding period was determined to commence from the date of the allotment letter, resulting in the gain being classified as long-term. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the deduction claim u/s 54F, emphasizing the authority of appellate bodies to entertain such claims. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for verification in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.