Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the transfer of the right to acquire property should be categorized as a long-term or short-term capital gain. The Tribunal found that the right accrued to the assessee upon issuance of the allotment letter, granting the right to purchase the flat. The holding period was determined to commence from the date of the allotment letter, resulting in the gain being classified as long-term. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the deduction claim u/s 54F, emphasizing the authority of appellate bodies to entertain such claims. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for verification in accordance with the law.
The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the transfer of the right to acquire property should be categorized as a long-term or short-term capital gain. The Tribunal found that the right accrued to the assessee upon issuance of the allotment letter, granting the right to purchase the flat. The holding period was determined to commence from the date of the allotment letter, resulting in the gain being classified as long-term. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the deduction claim u/s 54F, emphasizing the authority of appellate bodies to entertain such claims. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for verification in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.