Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The case pertains to denial of exemption u/s 11 due to alleged violation of provisions of section 13(1)(c). The Appellate Tribunal held that as the society is notified u/s 10(23C)(iv) and registered u/s 12A(a) of the Act, the conditions u/s 13 do not apply, as per CBDT Circular No. 557, dated 19.03.1990. Therefore, the Assessing Officer cannot disallow u/s 11. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order allowing the appeal, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.
The case pertains to denial of exemption u/s 11 due to alleged violation of provisions of section 13(1)(c). The Appellate Tribunal held that as the society is notified u/s 10(23C)(iv) and registered u/s 12A(a) of the Act, the conditions u/s 13 do not apply, as per CBDT Circular No. 557, dated 19.03.1990. Therefore, the Assessing Officer cannot disallow u/s 11. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order allowing the appeal, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.