Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal held that income earned from investments in cooperative banks, which are not cooperative societies, is not eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The argument that cooperative banks are also cooperative societies was deemed baseless. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to examine if investments with cooperative banks were made due to statutory compulsions and, if so, to consider granting deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. If not eligible under 80P(2)(a)(i), the AO should assess eligibility u/s 80P(2)(d) in light of a recent Supreme Court judgment. If neither section applies, the AO should consider a deduction u/s 57 for the cost of funds. The Tribunal relied on the Karnataka High Court judgment for granting deduction for the cost of funds and ordered consideration of the assessee's claim in ground 4.1.
The Appellate Tribunal held that income earned from investments in cooperative banks, which are not cooperative societies, is not eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The argument that cooperative banks are also cooperative societies was deemed baseless. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to examine if investments with cooperative banks were made due to statutory compulsions and, if so, to consider granting deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. If not eligible under 80P(2)(a)(i), the AO should assess eligibility u/s 80P(2)(d) in light of a recent Supreme Court judgment. If neither section applies, the AO should consider a deduction u/s 57 for the cost of funds. The Tribunal relied on the Karnataka High Court judgment for granting deduction for the cost of funds and ordered consideration of the assessee's claim in ground 4.1.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.