Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The case involved a dispute over the appealability of assessments and the refund of excess customs duty payment. The appellate tribunal held that the refund claim was rejected as it was not part of the final reassessment order. The appellant should have challenged the final reassessment order to modify the amount. Refund proceedings cannot alter assessments unless modified. All assessments, including self-assessments, are appealable. The appellant's claim for refund was rightly rejected, citing the principle of unjust enrichment. The appeal was dismissed as there were no merits.
The case involved a dispute over the appealability of assessments and the refund of excess customs duty payment. The appellate tribunal held that the refund claim was rejected as it was not part of the final reassessment order. The appellant should have challenged the final reassessment order to modify the amount. Refund proceedings cannot alter assessments unless modified. All assessments, including self-assessments, are appealable. The appellant's claim for refund was rightly rejected, citing the principle of unjust enrichment. The appeal was dismissed as there were no merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.