Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The case involved a dispute over the appealability of assessments and the refund of excess customs duty payment. The appellate tribunal held that the refund claim was rejected as it was not part of the final reassessment order. The appellant should have challenged the final reassessment order to modify the amount. Refund proceedings cannot alter assessments unless modified. All assessments, including self-assessments, are appealable. The appellant's claim for refund was rightly rejected, citing the principle of unjust enrichment. The appeal was dismissed as there were no merits.
The case involved a dispute over the appealability of assessments and the refund of excess customs duty payment. The appellate tribunal held that the refund claim was rejected as it was not part of the final reassessment order. The appellant should have challenged the final reassessment order to modify the amount. Refund proceedings cannot alter assessments unless modified. All assessments, including self-assessments, are appealable. The appellant's claim for refund was rightly rejected, citing the principle of unjust enrichment. The appeal was dismissed as there were no merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
