Penny-stock additions require transaction-specific evidence; general investigation material alone cannot establish undisclosed income or accommodation...
Transfer pricing comparability prioritises reliable external CUPs and foreign-currency LIBOR benchmarks for exports, borrowings and delayed receivable...
Section 153C satisfaction and seized electronic records sustained unexplained-investment addition, subject to proportionate ownership-share verificati...
The case involves an appeal before the CESTAT challenging an assessment that led to an enhancement of value accepted by the importer. The CBIC's circular dated 02.11.2023 sets a monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs below which no appeal can be filed before the CESTAT. The duty amount in this appeal falls below this threshold. Citing a Bombay High Court decision, the appeal is deemed not maintainable as per the CBIC's instructions. Therefore, the appeal has been dismissed.
The case involves an appeal before the CESTAT challenging an assessment that led to an enhancement of value accepted by the importer. The CBIC's circular dated 02.11.2023 sets a monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs below which no appeal can be filed before the CESTAT. The duty amount in this appeal falls below this threshold. Citing a Bombay High Court decision, the appeal is deemed not maintainable as per the CBIC's instructions. Therefore, the appeal has been dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.