Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The High Court considered a bail application in a money...
High Court denied bail in a money laundering case involving leasing Waqf properties. Accused misled about surgery, evidence pointed to criminal conspiracy.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The High Court considered a bail application in a money laundering case involving illegal gratification for leasing Waqf properties. It assessed the evidentiary value of statements u/s 50 of PMLA for bail purposes. The evidence indicated a criminal conspiracy involving the accused in investing proceeds of crime in immovable properties. The Court found that the accused misled about the necessity of bail for a surgery, casting doubt on their credibility. The Court concluded that the evidence warranted the application of Section 45 of PMLA, denying bail to the applicants. The bail application was dismissed.
The High Court considered a bail application in a money laundering case involving illegal gratification for leasing Waqf properties. It assessed the evidentiary value of statements u/s 50 of PMLA for bail purposes. The evidence indicated a criminal conspiracy involving the accused in investing proceeds of crime in immovable properties. The Court found that the accused misled about the necessity of bail for a surgery, casting doubt on their credibility. The Court concluded that the evidence warranted the application of Section 45 of PMLA, denying bail to the applicants. The bail application was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.