Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The High Court considered a case involving the effect of a retrospective amendment in Section 50 of the CGST Act, 2017 by the Finance Act, 2021. The petition was dismissed due to the appellants' delay in approaching the court. The court noted that the appellate authority did not address the impact of the retrospective amendment in its previous order. As a legal issue was raised, the court allowed the appeal and writ petition, setting aside the appellate authority's order and remanding the matter for reconsideration in light of the retrospective amendment.
The High Court considered a case involving the effect of a retrospective amendment in Section 50 of the CGST Act, 2017 by the Finance Act, 2021. The petition was dismissed due to the appellants' delay in approaching the court. The court noted that the appellate authority did not address the impact of the retrospective amendment in its previous order. As a legal issue was raised, the court allowed the appeal and writ petition, setting aside the appellate authority's order and remanding the matter for reconsideration in light of the retrospective amendment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
