Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered a case involving the effect of a retrospective amendment in Section 50 of the CGST Act, 2017 by the Finance Act, 2021. The petition was dismissed due to the appellants' delay in approaching the court. The court noted that the appellate authority did not address the impact of the retrospective amendment in its previous order. As a legal issue was raised, the court allowed the appeal and writ petition, setting aside the appellate authority's order and remanding the matter for reconsideration in light of the retrospective amendment.
The High Court considered a case involving the effect of a retrospective amendment in Section 50 of the CGST Act, 2017 by the Finance Act, 2021. The petition was dismissed due to the appellants' delay in approaching the court. The court noted that the appellate authority did not address the impact of the retrospective amendment in its previous order. As a legal issue was raised, the court allowed the appeal and writ petition, setting aside the appellate authority's order and remanding the matter for reconsideration in light of the retrospective amendment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
