Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
The High Court considered a case involving the effect of a retrospective amendment in Section 50 of the CGST Act, 2017 by the Finance Act, 2021. The petition was dismissed due to the appellants' delay in approaching the court. The court noted that the appellate authority did not address the impact of the retrospective amendment in its previous order. As a legal issue was raised, the court allowed the appeal and writ petition, setting aside the appellate authority's order and remanding the matter for reconsideration in light of the retrospective amendment.
The High Court considered a case involving the effect of a retrospective amendment in Section 50 of the CGST Act, 2017 by the Finance Act, 2021. The petition was dismissed due to the appellants' delay in approaching the court. The court noted that the appellate authority did not address the impact of the retrospective amendment in its previous order. As a legal issue was raised, the court allowed the appeal and writ petition, setting aside the appellate authority's order and remanding the matter for reconsideration in light of the retrospective amendment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
