Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
The case involves a query regarding the classification of goods and services for GST purposes. The applicant sought clarification on the consideration charged for supplying aggregates and recovering royalty charges. The ruling determined that the applicant's tax collection on royalty charges and goods supplied separately in invoices indicated distinct transactions. Royalty charges were classified under SAC 997337, attracting 9% CGST and 9% SGST, while aggregates fell under HSN code 251710, subject to CGST @2.5% and SGST @2.5%. The ruling emphasized the separate nature of the transactions, not constituting mixed or composite supply.
The case involves a query regarding the classification of goods and services for GST purposes. The applicant sought clarification on the consideration charged for supplying aggregates and recovering royalty charges. The ruling determined that the applicant's tax collection on royalty charges and goods supplied separately in invoices indicated distinct transactions. Royalty charges were classified under SAC 997337, attracting 9% CGST and 9% SGST, while aggregates fell under HSN code 251710, subject to CGST @2.5% and SGST @2.5%. The ruling emphasized the separate nature of the transactions, not constituting mixed or composite supply.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
