Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The case involved issues regarding the approval of a Resolution Plan, including eligibility criteria for association of allottees, locus to file an appeal, correctness of unsold area mentioned in the plan, commitment of payment, equal opportunity for submitting a plan, irregularities by the Resolution Professional, and objections raised by various parties. The NCLAT held that different eligibility criteria for allottees is sustainable, rational basis for the registration cutoff date, and the Plan's approval was not vitiated by various challenges. It found no fault in the Plan's details, including the unsold area and funding sources. The Resolution Plan was deemed compliant, and no interference was justified. The applicants' requests were dismissed, and the appeal was disposed of.
The case involved issues regarding the approval of a Resolution Plan, including eligibility criteria for association of allottees, locus to file an appeal, correctness of unsold area mentioned in the plan, commitment of payment, equal opportunity for submitting a plan, irregularities by the Resolution Professional, and objections raised by various parties. The NCLAT held that different eligibility criteria for allottees is sustainable, rational basis for the registration cutoff date, and the Plan's approval was not vitiated by various challenges. It found no fault in the Plan's details, including the unsold area and funding sources. The Resolution Plan was deemed compliant, and no interference was justified. The applicants' requests were dismissed, and the appeal was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
