Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The case involved issues regarding the approval of a Resolution Plan, including eligibility criteria for association of allottees, locus to file an appeal, correctness of unsold area mentioned in the plan, commitment of payment, equal opportunity for submitting a plan, irregularities by the Resolution Professional, and objections raised by various parties. The NCLAT held that different eligibility criteria for allottees is sustainable, rational basis for the registration cutoff date, and the Plan's approval was not vitiated by various challenges. It found no fault in the Plan's details, including the unsold area and funding sources. The Resolution Plan was deemed compliant, and no interference was justified. The applicants' requests were dismissed, and the appeal was disposed of.
The case involved issues regarding the approval of a Resolution Plan, including eligibility criteria for association of allottees, locus to file an appeal, correctness of unsold area mentioned in the plan, commitment of payment, equal opportunity for submitting a plan, irregularities by the Resolution Professional, and objections raised by various parties. The NCLAT held that different eligibility criteria for allottees is sustainable, rational basis for the registration cutoff date, and the Plan's approval was not vitiated by various challenges. It found no fault in the Plan's details, including the unsold area and funding sources. The Resolution Plan was deemed compliant, and no interference was justified. The applicants' requests were dismissed, and the appeal was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.