Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues regarding the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) offense, including confiscation of seized funds, under-invoicing imports, reliance on statements, denial of cross-examination, and charges of contravention. The Tribunal found the statements made by the Appellant to be true and voluntary, upheld the validity of the Show Cause Notices (SCNs), and established charges of contravention against the Appellant. The Tribunal reduced the penalty amount imposed and ordered adjustment of the pre-deposit. The Tribunal also set aside certain charges and directed a refund. The Appellant, now deceased, was represented by legal heirs.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues regarding the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) offense, including confiscation of seized funds, under-invoicing imports, reliance on statements, denial of cross-examination, and charges of contravention. The Tribunal found the statements made by the Appellant to be true and voluntary, upheld the validity of the Show Cause Notices (SCNs), and established charges of contravention against the Appellant. The Tribunal reduced the penalty amount imposed and ordered adjustment of the pre-deposit. The Tribunal also set aside certain charges and directed a refund. The Appellant, now deceased, was represented by legal heirs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
