Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The High Court addressed an issue where the petitioner couldn't upload a reply to a show cause notice (SCN) regarding discrepancies between their GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B filings. The court determined that the tax proposal was confirmed due to the petitioner's failure to respond to the SCN. To ensure justice, the court set aside the order, requiring the petitioner to pay 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits by submitting a reply to the SCN within the specified period. This decision disposed of the petition.
The High Court addressed an issue where the petitioner couldn't upload a reply to a show cause notice (SCN) regarding discrepancies between their GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B filings. The court determined that the tax proposal was confirmed due to the petitioner's failure to respond to the SCN. To ensure justice, the court set aside the order, requiring the petitioner to pay 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits by submitting a reply to the SCN within the specified period. This decision disposed of the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
