Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The High Court addressed an issue where the petitioner couldn't upload a reply to a show cause notice (SCN) regarding discrepancies between their GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B filings. The court determined that the tax proposal was confirmed due to the petitioner's failure to respond to the SCN. To ensure justice, the court set aside the order, requiring the petitioner to pay 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits by submitting a reply to the SCN within the specified period. This decision disposed of the petition.
The High Court addressed an issue where the petitioner couldn't upload a reply to a show cause notice (SCN) regarding discrepancies between their GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B filings. The court determined that the tax proposal was confirmed due to the petitioner's failure to respond to the SCN. To ensure justice, the court set aside the order, requiring the petitioner to pay 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits by submitting a reply to the SCN within the specified period. This decision disposed of the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
