Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
In a recent High Court case, the issue of whether advertisement expenditure could be considered as allowable revenue expenditure was discussed. The ITAT allowed the claim, citing a previous decision where the Tribunal's judgment was accepted by the Revenue. The Court agreed with the assessee, stating that the Revenue cannot raise a question of law if it had accepted the Tribunal's finding in a previous year. Regarding Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) payments, the Court followed a previous decision in favor of the assessee. Advances for Project Development were also treated as revenue expenses. Expenses related to workmen and staff welfare were allowed u/s 40A(9), following the principles established in a Supreme Court case. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision in the assessee's favor based on consistency with a previous year's ruling.
In a recent High Court case, the issue of whether advertisement expenditure could be considered as allowable revenue expenditure was discussed. The ITAT allowed the claim, citing a previous decision where the Tribunal's judgment was accepted by the Revenue. The Court agreed with the assessee, stating that the Revenue cannot raise a question of law if it had accepted the Tribunal's finding in a previous year. Regarding Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) payments, the Court followed a previous decision in favor of the assessee. Advances for Project Development were also treated as revenue expenses. Expenses related to workmen and staff welfare were allowed u/s 40A(9), following the principles established in a Supreme Court case. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision in the assessee's favor based on consistency with a previous year's ruling.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
