Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of Long Term Capital Gains arising from a joint development agreement. The question was whether the capital gain tax should be levied for A.Y. 2012-13 or 2015-16. It was held that the transfer does not occur merely upon entering the agreement; rather, it happens when the parties act in accordance with its terms. As the developer began activities after obtaining the plan sanction for A.Y. 2014-15 relevant to 2015-16, the capital gain was rightly computed for the latter year. The Assessing Officer erred in computing the gain for the earlier year, and the CIT(A) upheld this error. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition for A.Y. 2012-13, ruling in favor of the assessee.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of Long Term Capital Gains arising from a joint development agreement. The question was whether the capital gain tax should be levied for A.Y. 2012-13 or 2015-16. It was held that the transfer does not occur merely upon entering the agreement; rather, it happens when the parties act in accordance with its terms. As the developer began activities after obtaining the plan sanction for A.Y. 2014-15 relevant to 2015-16, the capital gain was rightly computed for the latter year. The Assessing Officer erred in computing the gain for the earlier year, and the CIT(A) upheld this error. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition for A.Y. 2012-13, ruling in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
