Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed a case involving the levy of a fiscal penalty of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- under the EPCG Scheme for failure to submit required documents. The petitioner failed to meet export obligations and maintain Annual Average, using duplicated bills. The penalty was imposed under the Foreign Trade Act, with appeal provisions. The petitioner directly approached the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution without exhausting the appeal remedy. The Court found the petition lacking in merit and dismissed it.
The High Court addressed a case involving the levy of a fiscal penalty of Rs. 1,00,00,000/- under the EPCG Scheme for failure to submit required documents. The petitioner failed to meet export obligations and maintain Annual Average, using duplicated bills. The penalty was imposed under the Foreign Trade Act, with appeal provisions. The petitioner directly approached the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution without exhausting the appeal remedy. The Court found the petition lacking in merit and dismissed it.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.