Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
In a case concerning the levy of GST on Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA), the High Court held that the petitioner failed to provide a reasonable explanation for not submitting a written explanation or seeking a personal hearing in response to a show-cause notice issued by the tax authority. The Court emphasized that the petitioner had the opportunity to explain the reasons for not complying with the notice before challenging it in court. As the petitioner did not avail this opportunity, the Court dismissed the petition, ruling it as not maintainable.
In a case concerning the levy of GST on Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA), the High Court held that the petitioner failed to provide a reasonable explanation for not submitting a written explanation or seeking a personal hearing in response to a show-cause notice issued by the tax authority. The Court emphasized that the petitioner had the opportunity to explain the reasons for not complying with the notice before challenging it in court. As the petitioner did not avail this opportunity, the Court dismissed the petition, ruling it as not maintainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
