TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order of the...
Appellate Tribunal overturns CIT(A) decision due to missed notices. Assessee gets chance to present case with evidence. Update contact info within 60 days.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) due to notices not being served on the assessee during the appellate proceedings because of address changes. The CIT(A) is directed to rehear the appeal, allowing the assessee to present their case with explanations and evidence. The CIT(A) may seek a remand report from the AO regarding the evidence/explanations provided by the assessee. The assessee must provide their correct address, email, and phone details to the AO and CIT(A) within 60 days. Failure to do so will result in notices being served at the address on record. The appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
The Appellate Tribunal set aside the ex-parte order of the CIT(A) due to notices not being served on the assessee during the appellate proceedings because of address changes. The CIT(A) is directed to rehear the appeal, allowing the assessee to present their case with explanations and evidence. The CIT(A) may seek a remand report from the AO regarding the evidence/explanations provided by the assessee. The assessee must provide their correct address, email, and phone details to the AO and CIT(A) within 60 days. Failure to do so will result in notices being served at the address on record. The appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.