Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involved the confiscation and imposition of fine and penalty on imported marble slabs due to a violation of import policy conditions. The appellant had imported the marble slabs at rates lower than 60 USD per sq.m, leading to an enhancement of the declared value by the adjudicating authority. The Commissioner(Appeals) reduced the fine and penalty, noting the unintentional mistake by the appellant. The Tribunal found the direction to pay redemption fine and penalty excessive, reducing it to 10% and 5% of the enhanced value, citing precedents for similar cases. The appeal was disposed of with the modified order.
The case involved the confiscation and imposition of fine and penalty on imported marble slabs due to a violation of import policy conditions. The appellant had imported the marble slabs at rates lower than 60 USD per sq.m, leading to an enhancement of the declared value by the adjudicating authority. The Commissioner(Appeals) reduced the fine and penalty, noting the unintentional mistake by the appellant. The Tribunal found the direction to pay redemption fine and penalty excessive, reducing it to 10% and 5% of the enhanced value, citing precedents for similar cases. The appeal was disposed of with the modified order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.