Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The case involves interest on a refund claim u/s 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The issue was whether interest should be calculated from three months after the Tribunal's final order or from the date of the order. The appellant was found entitled to interest u/s 11BB. The Supreme Court clarified that certain refunds are not covered by Section 11B or 35FF, so the denial of interest was unjustified. The appellant was entitled to interest from the date of deposit till refund at a rate of 12% per annum due to the denial of a benefit. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the previous findings.
The case involves interest on a refund claim u/s 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The issue was whether interest should be calculated from three months after the Tribunal's final order or from the date of the order. The appellant was found entitled to interest u/s 11BB. The Supreme Court clarified that certain refunds are not covered by Section 11B or 35FF, so the denial of interest was unjustified. The appellant was entitled to interest from the date of deposit till refund at a rate of 12% per annum due to the denial of a benefit. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the previous findings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.