Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
The High Court considered a case involving refund of accumulated credit due to inverted tax structure u/s 54(3) Proviso and Rule 89(5) of CGST Rules. The court held that the orders rejecting the refund claims were quashed and remanded for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority. The petition was disposed of by way of remand for proper review of the refund claims in line with the law.
The High Court considered a case involving refund of accumulated credit due to inverted tax structure u/s 54(3) Proviso and Rule 89(5) of CGST Rules. The court held that the orders rejecting the refund claims were quashed and remanded for fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority. The petition was disposed of by way of remand for proper review of the refund claims in line with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
