Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The High Court rejected settlement applications by appellants for suppressing income, following the demise of the original assessee. The Settlement Commission found shortcomings in income disclosure, including lack of details on foreign accounts, investments, and business activities. The Commission observed non-cooperation in explaining transactions, leading to rejection of settlements. The Court upheld the Commission's decision, stating that factual findings should not be interfered with unless there is a clear error. Restraint was advised in challenging the Commission's order. The writ petitions filed by the appellants were dismissed by the Court.
The High Court rejected settlement applications by appellants for suppressing income, following the demise of the original assessee. The Settlement Commission found shortcomings in income disclosure, including lack of details on foreign accounts, investments, and business activities. The Commission observed non-cooperation in explaining transactions, leading to rejection of settlements. The Court upheld the Commission's decision, stating that factual findings should not be interfered with unless there is a clear error. Restraint was advised in challenging the Commission's order. The writ petitions filed by the appellants were dismissed by the Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.