Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of whether land sold...
Tribunal: Land sold keeps agricultural status for LTCG if used for farming. Check if it meets definition of agricultural land. Deductions u/s 54F/54B allowed.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of whether land sold should be treated as agricultural for Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) purposes. The Department did not challenge that agricultural activities were ongoing until the sale. The Tribunal agreed that continuous agricultural use means the land retains its agricultural status despite prior non-agricultural conversion. Citing legal precedent, the Tribunal noted the need to determine if the land meets the definition of agricultural land u/s 2(14) of the Act. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for this evaluation. The Tribunal upheld the direction to allow deductions u/s 54F/54B, finding no fault with the decision. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes.
The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of whether land sold should be treated as agricultural for Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) purposes. The Department did not challenge that agricultural activities were ongoing until the sale. The Tribunal agreed that continuous agricultural use means the land retains its agricultural status despite prior non-agricultural conversion. Citing legal precedent, the Tribunal noted the need to determine if the land meets the definition of agricultural land u/s 2(14) of the Act. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for this evaluation. The Tribunal upheld the direction to allow deductions u/s 54F/54B, finding no fault with the decision. The appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.