Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of exemption u/s 11 regarding the non-utilization of 85% of grants-in-aid received during the year. The Tribunal found that the assessee, a statutory body, followed proper accounting procedures treating grants as liabilities until utilized by implementing agencies. The Assessing Officer's objection to the accounting method was deemed incorrect as the assessee's treatment of income and expenditure was consistent and valid. The principle of res judicata was discussed, emphasizing that each tax year is independent. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's compliance with accounting standards and rejected the Revenue's claim that the investment in equity shares violated section 13(1)(d). The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of exemption u/s 11 regarding the non-utilization of 85% of grants-in-aid received during the year. The Tribunal found that the assessee, a statutory body, followed proper accounting procedures treating grants as liabilities until utilized by implementing agencies. The Assessing Officer's objection to the accounting method was deemed incorrect as the assessee's treatment of income and expenditure was consistent and valid. The principle of res judicata was discussed, emphasizing that each tax year is independent. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's compliance with accounting standards and rejected the Revenue's claim that the investment in equity shares violated section 13(1)(d). The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.