Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of exemption u/s 11 regarding the non-utilization of 85% of grants-in-aid received during the year. The Tribunal found that the assessee, a statutory body, followed proper accounting procedures treating grants as liabilities until utilized by implementing agencies. The Assessing Officer's objection to the accounting method was deemed incorrect as the assessee's treatment of income and expenditure was consistent and valid. The principle of res judicata was discussed, emphasizing that each tax year is independent. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's compliance with accounting standards and rejected the Revenue's claim that the investment in equity shares violated section 13(1)(d). The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of exemption u/s 11 regarding the non-utilization of 85% of grants-in-aid received during the year. The Tribunal found that the assessee, a statutory body, followed proper accounting procedures treating grants as liabilities until utilized by implementing agencies. The Assessing Officer's objection to the accounting method was deemed incorrect as the assessee's treatment of income and expenditure was consistent and valid. The principle of res judicata was discussed, emphasizing that each tax year is independent. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's compliance with accounting standards and rejected the Revenue's claim that the investment in equity shares violated section 13(1)(d). The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
