Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The case involved the levy of service tax on remuneration to the Vice-Chairman cum Managing Director (VCMD). The issue was whether the VCMD was an employee of the company or providing services to it. The Appellate Tribunal held that the VCMD, appointed by the Board, was considered a key managerial person under the Companies Act, 2013. As a Managing Director, he was an employee of the company, entitled to remuneration and commission. His role as Managing Director did not fall under the definition of "service" for tax purposes. The Tribunal set aside the order, allowing the appeal.
The case involved the levy of service tax on remuneration to the Vice-Chairman cum Managing Director (VCMD). The issue was whether the VCMD was an employee of the company or providing services to it. The Appellate Tribunal held that the VCMD, appointed by the Board, was considered a key managerial person under the Companies Act, 2013. As a Managing Director, he was an employee of the company, entitled to remuneration and commission. His role as Managing Director did not fall under the definition of "service" for tax purposes. The Tribunal set aside the order, allowing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
