Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The High Court addressed issues regarding dishonour of cheques during insolvency proceedings, vicarious liability of directors, and the application of Section 14 of the IBC Act. It held that Section 14 of the IBC Act applies to corporate debtors, not natural persons, and does not exonerate individuals from criminal liability u/s 138 of the N.I. Act. The court found that the applicants had no knowledge of issuing the cheques, as they had not signed them, and lacked specific status or role in the complaint. Thus, the court allowed the application to quash the complaint u/s 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to prevent abuse of court process and secure justice.
The High Court addressed issues regarding dishonour of cheques during insolvency proceedings, vicarious liability of directors, and the application of Section 14 of the IBC Act. It held that Section 14 of the IBC Act applies to corporate debtors, not natural persons, and does not exonerate individuals from criminal liability u/s 138 of the N.I. Act. The court found that the applicants had no knowledge of issuing the cheques, as they had not signed them, and lacked specific status or role in the complaint. Thus, the court allowed the application to quash the complaint u/s 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to prevent abuse of court process and secure justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
