Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition challenging an assessment order under the Tax Legislation. The court held that generally, when a statutory appeal remedy is available, a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not be entertained. However, exceptions exist. The court noted that if an assessment order is challenged on the grounds of cross jurisdiction, the order can be interfered with. The court directed the petitioner to file a review application before a Single Judge to raise arguments on the issue of jurisdiction based on relevant judgments.
The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition challenging an assessment order under the Tax Legislation. The court held that generally, when a statutory appeal remedy is available, a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not be entertained. However, exceptions exist. The court noted that if an assessment order is challenged on the grounds of cross jurisdiction, the order can be interfered with. The court directed the petitioner to file a review application before a Single Judge to raise arguments on the issue of jurisdiction based on relevant judgments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
