Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition challenging an assessment order under the Tax Legislation. The court held that generally, when a statutory appeal remedy is available, a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not be entertained. However, exceptions exist. The court noted that if an assessment order is challenged on the grounds of cross jurisdiction, the order can be interfered with. The court directed the petitioner to file a review application before a Single Judge to raise arguments on the issue of jurisdiction based on relevant judgments.
The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition challenging an assessment order under the Tax Legislation. The court held that generally, when a statutory appeal remedy is available, a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not be entertained. However, exceptions exist. The court noted that if an assessment order is challenged on the grounds of cross jurisdiction, the order can be interfered with. The court directed the petitioner to file a review application before a Single Judge to raise arguments on the issue of jurisdiction based on relevant judgments.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
