Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
741 to 760 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the petitioner not having a fair opportunity to contest a tax demand. The court noted that the petitioner's GST registration was canceled without sufficient opportunity to address discrepancies in returns. The court set aside the order canceling the registration and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner was directed to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within three weeks for further proceedings. The petition was disposed of by way of remand for a fair opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits.
The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the petitioner not having a fair opportunity to contest a tax demand. The court noted that the petitioner's GST registration was canceled without sufficient opportunity to address discrepancies in returns. The court set aside the order canceling the registration and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner was directed to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within three weeks for further proceedings. The petition was disposed of by way of remand for a fair opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
