Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the petitioner not having a fair opportunity to contest a tax demand. The court noted that the petitioner's GST registration was canceled without sufficient opportunity to address discrepancies in returns. The court set aside the order canceling the registration and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner was directed to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within three weeks for further proceedings. The petition was disposed of by way of remand for a fair opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits.
The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the petitioner not having a fair opportunity to contest a tax demand. The court noted that the petitioner's GST registration was canceled without sufficient opportunity to address discrepancies in returns. The court set aside the order canceling the registration and remanded the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner was directed to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand within three weeks for further proceedings. The petition was disposed of by way of remand for a fair opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.