Revisional power in block assessment upheld, undisclosed search income sustained, freight suppression addition restored, accrued lorry hire liability ...
Reassessment and fee-for-technical-services classification: reopening upheld, but certain reimbursements and mobilization charges fell outside treaty ...
Section 80P deduction for co-operative societies remains available despite nominal members and housing society status, with limited interest income tr...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4721 to 4740 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal held in favor of the assessee regarding addition towards prior period expenses, citing consistency in previous rulings and emphasizing the assessing officer's obligation to consider the status as a whole. The Tribunal rejected the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for demurrage charges, noting the nature of payments to foreign shipping companies and applicability of relevant Board Circular. TDS credit was denied initially due to non-inclusion in Form-26AS, but the Tribunal referred to CBDT Circular allowing credit based on original Form-16A submission, directing verification by the assessing officer. The Tribunal upheld the charging of interest u/s 234C, citing the lack of provision for waiver despite financial restructuring.
The Appellate Tribunal held in favor of the assessee regarding addition towards prior period expenses, citing consistency in previous rulings and emphasizing the assessing officer's obligation to consider the status as a whole. The Tribunal rejected the disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for demurrage charges, noting the nature of payments to foreign shipping companies and applicability of relevant Board Circular. TDS credit was denied initially due to non-inclusion in Form-26AS, but the Tribunal referred to CBDT Circular allowing credit based on original Form-16A submission, directing verification by the assessing officer. The Tribunal upheld the charging of interest u/s 234C, citing the lack of provision for waiver despite financial restructuring.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.