Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal held that negative working capital adjustment cannot be made for a captive service provider. L&T Infotech Ltd. and Infosys Ltd. were excluded from comparables as the assessee is a captive service provider compensated on a cost+mark-up basis. Persistent Systems Ltd. was excluded due to lack of segmental details. Infobeans Technologies Ltd. was found not functionally comparable. Tata Elxsi Ltd. was excluded as it generates revenue from product sales. Mindtree Ltd. & Nihilent Ltd. lacked segmental financials. Cygnet Infotech Pvt. Ltd. was excluded for not being a captive service provider. Cybage Software Pvt. Ltd. was excluded due to diversified activities. Batchmaster Software Pvt. Ltd. was remanded for further verification. The issue of deduction u/s. 10AA and interest levy u/s. 234A, 234B, 234C requires verification by the assessing officer based on evidence provided by the assessee.
The Appellate Tribunal held that negative working capital adjustment cannot be made for a captive service provider. L&T Infotech Ltd. and Infosys Ltd. were excluded from comparables as the assessee is a captive service provider compensated on a cost+mark-up basis. Persistent Systems Ltd. was excluded due to lack of segmental details. Infobeans Technologies Ltd. was found not functionally comparable. Tata Elxsi Ltd. was excluded as it generates revenue from product sales. Mindtree Ltd. & Nihilent Ltd. lacked segmental financials. Cygnet Infotech Pvt. Ltd. was excluded for not being a captive service provider. Cybage Software Pvt. Ltd. was excluded due to diversified activities. Batchmaster Software Pvt. Ltd. was remanded for further verification. The issue of deduction u/s. 10AA and interest levy u/s. 234A, 234B, 234C requires verification by the assessing officer based on evidence provided by the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
