Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
581 to 600 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Appellate Tribunal held that negative working capital adjustment cannot be made for a captive service provider. L&T Infotech Ltd. and Infosys Ltd. were excluded from comparables as the assessee is a captive service provider compensated on a cost+mark-up basis. Persistent Systems Ltd. was excluded due to lack of segmental details. Infobeans Technologies Ltd. was found not functionally comparable. Tata Elxsi Ltd. was excluded as it generates revenue from product sales. Mindtree Ltd. & Nihilent Ltd. lacked segmental financials. Cygnet Infotech Pvt. Ltd. was excluded for not being a captive service provider. Cybage Software Pvt. Ltd. was excluded due to diversified activities. Batchmaster Software Pvt. Ltd. was remanded for further verification. The issue of deduction u/s. 10AA and interest levy u/s. 234A, 234B, 234C requires verification by the assessing officer based on evidence provided by the assessee.
The Appellate Tribunal held that negative working capital adjustment cannot be made for a captive service provider. L&T Infotech Ltd. and Infosys Ltd. were excluded from comparables as the assessee is a captive service provider compensated on a cost+mark-up basis. Persistent Systems Ltd. was excluded due to lack of segmental details. Infobeans Technologies Ltd. was found not functionally comparable. Tata Elxsi Ltd. was excluded as it generates revenue from product sales. Mindtree Ltd. & Nihilent Ltd. lacked segmental financials. Cygnet Infotech Pvt. Ltd. was excluded for not being a captive service provider. Cybage Software Pvt. Ltd. was excluded due to diversified activities. Batchmaster Software Pvt. Ltd. was remanded for further verification. The issue of deduction u/s. 10AA and interest levy u/s. 234A, 234B, 234C requires verification by the assessing officer based on evidence provided by the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.