Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that deduction u/s 80IB(10) is allowed for flats exceeding 1000 sq. fts excluding open sky balcony. The Tribunal upheld the use of "Project Completion Method" for profit determination. High Court dismissed Revenue's appeal. The requirement for deduction u/s 80IB(10) is met if a housing project is approved by a local authority. The argument to combine projects under a common approval was rejected. No specific finding on violation of conditions in clauses (e) & (f) of section 80IB(10) was made, so this ground was rejected. Assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT held that deduction u/s 80IB(10) is allowed for flats exceeding 1000 sq. fts excluding open sky balcony. The Tribunal upheld the use of "Project Completion Method" for profit determination. High Court dismissed Revenue's appeal. The requirement for deduction u/s 80IB(10) is met if a housing project is approved by a local authority. The argument to combine projects under a common approval was rejected. No specific finding on violation of conditions in clauses (e) & (f) of section 80IB(10) was made, so this ground was rejected. Assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.