Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
The case involved a dispute over CENVAT Credit denial based on a board circular alleging undervaluation of assets and claiming dual benefits. The Circular merely advised informing the income tax department about claimed expenses to avoid double benefits. It did not mandate CENVAT credit denial. The Tribunal in a similar case ruled that legitimate CENVAT credit under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 is unaffected by income tax treatment. Consequently, the appellant was deemed eligible for CENVAT credit, and the earlier denial was overturned, allowing the appeal.
The case involved a dispute over CENVAT Credit denial based on a board circular alleging undervaluation of assets and claiming dual benefits. The Circular merely advised informing the income tax department about claimed expenses to avoid double benefits. It did not mandate CENVAT credit denial. The Tribunal in a similar case ruled that legitimate CENVAT credit under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 is unaffected by income tax treatment. Consequently, the appellant was deemed eligible for CENVAT credit, and the earlier denial was overturned, allowing the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
